TOKENIZATION POLICY
The Vanderbilt Terminal for Digital Asset Policy & Regulation
INDEPENDENT INTELLIGENCE FOR TOKENIZATION POLICY, LEGISLATION & POLITICAL ECONOMY
GENIUS Act: Signed Law ▲ Jul 18 2025| MiCA Status: Live ▲ Dec 2024| CLARITY Act: Senate Pending ▲ Jul 2025| Crypto Lobbying 2024: $202M PAC ▲ Fairshake| OECD CARF Countries: 75+ ▲ +12| CBDC Projects: 130+ Active ▲ Atlantic Council| FATF Travel Rule: 73% Compliant ▲ Jun 2025| Pro-Crypto Congress: 300+ Members ▲ +91| GENIUS Act: Signed Law ▲ Jul 18 2025| MiCA Status: Live ▲ Dec 2024| CLARITY Act: Senate Pending ▲ Jul 2025| Crypto Lobbying 2024: $202M PAC ▲ Fairshake| OECD CARF Countries: 75+ ▲ +12| CBDC Projects: 130+ Active ▲ Atlantic Council| FATF Travel Rule: 73% Compliant ▲ Jun 2025| Pro-Crypto Congress: 300+ Members ▲ +91|
HomeEncyclopedia › FSB (Financial Stability Board)

FSB (Financial Stability Board)

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) is an international body established by the G20 to monitor and make recommendations regarding the global financial system. Created in April 2009 as the successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis, the FSB coordinates national financial authorities and international standard-setting bodies to develop and promote the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory, and other financial sector policies.

Institutional Structure and G20 Mandate

The FSB operates under a mandate from the G20 heads of government and reports to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. Its membership includes representatives of national financial authorities — central banks, supervisory authorities, and treasury ministries — from the G20 countries plus several significant non-G20 economies, together with representatives of international standard-setting bodies including the Basel Committee, IOSCO, the IAIS, the CPMI, the IMF, the World Bank, the OECD, and the ECB.

The FSB’s work is organized through standing committees covering vulnerabilities assessment, supervisory and regulatory cooperation, and standards implementation. The Secretariat is hosted by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel. The FSB does not issue legally binding standards; its recommendations must be implemented through the domestic regulatory and legislative processes of member jurisdictions, giving the G20’s political commitment to FSB standards the operational significance they carry.

Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, has served as FSB Chair since 2023. His dual role as both the UK’s senior central banker and chair of the principal international financial stability coordinating body has given him particular influence in shaping the global response to crypto asset risks.

The 2023 Crypto Recommendations

The FSB published its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto-asset activities and markets in July 2023. The recommendations addressed three primary areas: the regulation of crypto-asset service providers’ activities (including exchanges, custodians, and lending platforms), the oversight of crypto-asset arrangements that have systemic potential, and cross-border cooperation among national regulators.

The recommendations apply the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” — the idea that financial activities should be regulated based on their economic substance rather than the technology through which they are delivered. Key recommendations included that jurisdictions should apply activity-specific regulations to crypto asset services comparable to those applied to similar activities in traditional finance, should require comprehensive disclosure to users, should ensure robust segregation of client assets, and should establish cross-border information-sharing arrangements to address the global nature of crypto markets.

In the same month, the FSB also published updated recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements, building on earlier 2020 guidance in response to the collapse of TerraUSD and the failures of several stablecoin arrangements. These recommendations emphasized 1:1 reserve requirements, redemption at par, robust governance, and the application of payment system oversight standards to stablecoin arrangements with systemic scale.

From Recommendations to National Law

The FSB’s recommendations become operationally effective through a multi-stage process. The G20 endorses FSB recommendations in its Finance Ministers and Leaders communiqués, creating a political commitment from member governments. National financial authorities — represented on the FSB — then incorporate FSB recommendations into their domestic regulatory programs, either directly through rulemaking or as inputs to legislative proposals.

The implementation pathway varies significantly by jurisdiction and recommendation. Where a recommendation aligns with existing regulatory philosophy and legislative authority, implementation can be rapid. Where recommendations require new legislation, the timeline may extend over multiple years. The FSB monitors implementation through peer review processes and annual progress reports, creating public accountability for the gap between political commitment and regulatory action.

October 2025 Peer Review: Implementation Gaps

The FSB’s October 2025 peer review of jurisdictions’ implementation of the 2023 crypto recommendations found significant and widespread implementation gaps. The review found that fewer than half of FSB member jurisdictions had fully implemented the July 2023 recommendations in binding regulation, with many jurisdictions still in consultation or legislative drafting phases two years after the recommendations’ publication. The review identified eight new recommendations directed at closing the most critical gaps, focusing particularly on comprehensive CASP registration requirements, client asset segregation enforcement, and cross-border supervisory cooperation arrangements.

The October 2025 findings reinforced the ongoing divergence between the FSB’s aspirational standard-setting and the uneven pace of national regulatory implementation, a challenge that has characterized international financial standard-setting since the FSB’s creation.

Policy Intelligence

Full access to legislative analysis, country profiles, and political economy research.

Subscribe →