TOKENIZATION POLICY
The Vanderbilt Terminal for Digital Asset Policy & Regulation
INDEPENDENT INTELLIGENCE FOR TOKENIZATION POLICY, LEGISLATION & POLITICAL ECONOMY
GENIUS Act: Signed Law ▲ Jul 18 2025| MiCA Status: Live ▲ Dec 2024| CLARITY Act: Senate Pending ▲ Jul 2025| Crypto Lobbying 2024: $202M PAC ▲ Fairshake| OECD CARF Countries: 75+ ▲ +12| CBDC Projects: 130+ Active ▲ Atlantic Council| FATF Travel Rule: 73% Compliant ▲ Jun 2025| Pro-Crypto Congress: 300+ Members ▲ +91| GENIUS Act: Signed Law ▲ Jul 18 2025| MiCA Status: Live ▲ Dec 2024| CLARITY Act: Senate Pending ▲ Jul 2025| Crypto Lobbying 2024: $202M PAC ▲ Fairshake| OECD CARF Countries: 75+ ▲ +12| CBDC Projects: 130+ Active ▲ Atlantic Council| FATF Travel Rule: 73% Compliant ▲ Jun 2025| Pro-Crypto Congress: 300+ Members ▲ +91|

Crypto Lobbying Spend Tracker

Follow the money. This tracker monitors declared US federal lobbying expenditure, PAC donations, and coalition spending by the crypto industry and its opponents — sourced from Senate Lobby Disclosure database, FEC filings, and OpenSecrets.

Money in politics is a public record in the United States. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) requires disclosure of PAC contributions, individual donations above thresholds, and independent expenditures. The Senate Lobby Disclosure Act requires biannual filings of federal lobbying activity, including which bills are being lobbied and how much is spent. OpenSecrets aggregates this data into searchable form. The crypto industry’s political spending is now among the most visible and documented in US financial services — and it is directly connected to the legislative outcomes that drive investment returns.

Fairshake PAC: The Dominant Force in Crypto Political Spending

Fairshake PAC raised and spent $202.9M in the 2024 election cycle, making it one of the best-funded single-focus political action committees in US political history. It operated as an independent expenditure committee — spending on advertising and political infrastructure independent of individual campaigns, consistent with Citizens United’s framework.

2024 Cycle Performance

  • Total spend: $202.9M
  • Win rate: 91% in contested races where Fairshake spent
  • Primary strategy: Independent expenditure advertising on crypto-specific issues in competitive primaries and general election races
  • Target races: Focused on incumbents with anti-crypto voting records and open seats where candidate positions were fluid

The 91% win rate reflects both effective candidate selection and the effectiveness of well-funded independent expenditure in competitive races with narrow margins.

Top Corporate Donors to Fairshake (2024 Cycle)

  • Coinbase: One of the largest single corporate contributors
  • a16z (Andreessen Horowitz): Significant venture capital contribution
  • Ripple Labs: Major contributor, with strategic interest in XRP regulatory status
  • Additional donors across crypto exchange, infrastructure, and venture categories

2026 Commitment Fairshake PAC has committed $193M for the 2026 midterm election cycle — an even larger war chest than the 2024 cycle. This committed spend signals that the crypto industry intends to maintain its Congressional influence operation at scale. For the 2026 midterms, Fairshake will focus on: defending crypto-friendly incumbents, targeting incumbents with negative voting records on CLARITY Act and related legislation, and participating in key Senate races where digital asset legislation committee composition is affected.

Federal Lobbying: Direct Expenditure on Legislation

US federal lobbying — distinct from PAC spending — requires Senate Lobby Disclosure Act filings. These filings disclose which bills are being lobbied, what agency activities are being tracked, and how much is spent.

Estimated Industry Spending H1 2025: $18.4M

This figure reflects direct federal lobbying expenditure disclosed by crypto industry companies and their trade associations. The GENIUS Act lobbying push, the CLARITY Act advocacy, and the SAB 121 rescission campaign all contributed to elevated spending in the period surrounding these legislative milestones.

Top Federal Lobbying Spenders (Crypto Industry)

Coinbase: Among the heaviest direct federal lobbying spenders in the industry. Coinbase’s government affairs team has focused on CLARITY Act passage, SEC engagement, and state-level legislation. Its lobbying filings disclose activity targeting Financial Services Committee, Agriculture Committee, and Banking Committee members.

Ripple Labs: Significant federal lobbying spend with a focus on XRP regulatory classification and CLARITY Act provisions affecting pre-2018 token distributions.

Circle: Active on GENIUS Act provisions affecting stablecoin issuer eligibility and reserve requirements. Circle’s lobbying focus on GENIUS Act reflected its direct commercial interest in the framework that validated its USDC model.

Blockchain Association: The trade association representing crypto companies in Washington. The Blockchain Association’s lobbying spend represents aggregated industry positions across member companies, focusing on legislative and regulatory engagement across all relevant bills.

TradFi Counter-Lobbying

The crypto industry’s political spending does not operate in a vacuum. Traditional financial services — banks, broker-dealers, asset managers — have their own lobbying infrastructure that occasionally intersects with crypto regulatory debates.

American Bankers Association (ABA): The ABA’s lobbying on GENIUS Act focused on provisions affecting bank stablecoin issuer competition with non-bank issuers, bank custody of crypto assets, and the interface between payment stablecoin regulation and bank deposit frameworks. Estimated annual lobbying spend is in the hundreds of millions across all issues — crypto is a fraction of ABA’s total agenda.

Large Bank Direct Lobbying: JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs all maintain significant federal lobbying operations. Their positions on crypto legislation have evolved: initially focused on protecting bank monopolies in payment services, increasingly focused on participating in the regulated digital asset infrastructure rather than blocking it.

Methodology

This tracker draws on three primary sources: FEC’s campaign finance database (PAC filings, individual contribution records, independent expenditure reports), the Senate Lobby Disclosure database (lobbying registrations, activity reports, expenditure disclosures), and OpenSecrets’ aggregation and analysis of both databases.

Lobbying expenditure figures are as declared in official filings. The figures undercount total industry political engagement because they exclude: state-level lobbying (separately reported in 50 states), grass-roots lobbying campaigns, think tank funding and research sponsorship, and soft political activity like conference sponsorship and academic engagement. The declared figures represent the minimum observable political spending; actual total engagement is substantially higher.

Full database with quarterly lobbying filing data, PAC contribution tracking, and individual candidate spending records available to subscribers.